Ann Coulter - November 12, 2008 - GOP VOTE DECLINES LESS THAN NYT PROFIT

GOP VOTE DECLINES LESS THAN NYT PROFIT





For the first time in 32 years, Democrats got more than 50 percent of the country to vote for their candidate in a national election, and now they want to lecture the Republican Party on how to win elections. Liberals are hoping no one will notice that we just lost by running the candidate they chose for us.

For years, New York Times columnist David Brooks has been writing mash notes to John McCain. In November 2007, for example, he cited a political consultant who exclaimed in private, "You know, there's really only one great man running for president this year, and that's McCain."

"My friend's remark," Brooks somberly intoned, "had the added weight of truth."

Brooks gushed, "I can tell you there is nobody in politics remotely like him," and even threw down the gauntlet, saying: "You will never persuade me that he is not among the finest of men."

That took guts at the Times, where McCain was constantly praised by every op-ed columnist and enthusiastically endorsed by the paper in the Republican primary. Even Frank Rich hailed McCain as the "most experienced and principled" of the Republicans. He said no one in either party "has more experience in matters of war than the Arizona senator." (This was the biggest rave issued by Rich since "Rent" opened on Broadway!)

Oh, yes, they loved McCain at the Times. Does anyone here not see a cluster of bright red flags?

Then Election Day arrived, and all the liberals who had spent years praising McCain voted for Obama. Despite Brooks’ boast in January this year about McCain's amazing ability to attract "independents," independents voted for Obama. Or against Obama. No one outside of McCain's immediate family was voting for McCain.

But now Brooks presumes to lecture Republicans about what to do next time. How about: "Don't take David Brooks' advice"?

According to Brooks, the reason McCain lost was -- naturally -- that he ran as a conservative. If only presidential candidates would spurn all known modern political history and listen to the wishful thinking of Times columnists!


If McCain lost because he ran as a conservative, then how come I knew McCain was going to lose before Brooks did? About the same time Brooks was touting McCain's uncanny ability to attract independents, I was writing, accurately: "John McCain is Bob Dole minus the charm, conservatism and youth."

Using the latest euphemism for "liberal Republican," Brooks complains that "reformist Republicans” like McCain are forced to run for president as smelly old conservatives: "National candidates who begin with reformist records -- Giuliani, Romney or McCain -- immediately tack right to be acceptable to the power base." (Some "tack" so far to the right they almost adopt the positions of the GOP!)

In another sign of how popular liberalism is, notice how liberal Republicans have to keep changing their name, like grifters moving from town to town. (Or like liberals – I mean “progressives.”) Liberal Republicans used to be known as "moderates." Then it was "mavericks." Then "centrists." I guess now they're "reformists." Maybe they have to disguise themselves for fear of being mobbed by an adoring public!

I gather by "reformist," Brooks means “liberal on abortion” because -- apart from abortion -- Rudy Giuliani was a right-wing lunatic. He engaged in aggressive policing, cut taxes, slashed government bureaucracies, abolished New York's affirmative action office and was repeatedly denounced as a storm trooper by The New York Times.

The same thing goes for Romney, who also cut taxes and government regulations, but promised Massachusetts voters he would not tinker with their beloved abortion rights.

Brooks throws them in with McCain only to spruce up McCain.

But strangely, McCain was a liberal on virtually every issue except abortion and gay marriage, which he made up for by bashing social conservatives to his media pals. They understood that his pro-life position was just a cynical ploy to get votes in Arizona.

If liberals are going to use their first majority vote in a national election since Helen Thomas was spilling champagne on Liza at Studio 54 to lecture Republicans on how to win elections, I have a tip for them based on the exact same election: Constitutional amendments banning gay marriage passed in every state where they were on the ballot -- Florida, Arizona, even in liberal California.

I'll accept the results of the presidential election, if you anti-Proposition 8 die-hards in California accept the results of that vote. Earth to protestors: Most Americans oppose gay marriage. Let's see, who was avidly pro-gay-marriage? Oh I remember: The guy who's once again lecturing Republicans on how to win elections: David Brooks.


COPYRIGHT 2008 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
1130 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106