Ann Coulter - January 23, 2008 - 'STRAIGHT TALK' EXPRESS TAKES SCENIC ROUTE TO TRUTH

'STRAIGHT TALK' EXPRESS TAKES SCENIC ROUTE TO TRUTH





John McCain is Bob Dole minus the charm, conservatism and youth. Like McCain, pollsters assured us that Dole was the most "electable" Republican. Unlike McCain, Dole didn't lie all the time while claiming to engage in “Straight Talk.”

Of course, I might lie constantly too, if I were seeking the Republican presidential nomination after enthusiastically promoting amnesty for illegal aliens, retroactive Social Security benefits for illegal aliens, criminal trials for terrorists, stem-cell research on human embryos, crackpot global warming legislation and free speech-crushing campaign-finance laws.

I might lie too, if I had opposed the Bush tax cuts, a marriage amendment to the Constitution, waterboarding terrorists and drilling in Alaska.

And I might lie if I had called the ads of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth "dishonest and dishonorable."

McCain angrily denounces the suggestion that his "comprehensive immigration reform" constituted "amnesty" -- on the grounds that it imposed a small fine on illegal aliens. Even the guy who graduated fifth from the bottom of his class at the U.S. Naval Academy ought to remember that he was the one calling this plan amnesty a few years ago.

In 2003, McCain told The Tucson Citizen that "amnesty has to be an important part" of any immigration reform. (He also rolled out the old chestnut about America's desperate need for illegals, who do "jobs that American workers simply won't do" – always a big vote-getter with American workers.)

McCain's amnesty bill would have immediately granted millions of newly legalized immigrants Social Security benefits. He even supported allowing work performed as an illegal to count toward Social Security benefits as recently as in 2006 – a vote now adamantly denied by Mr. Straight Talk.

McCain keeps boasting that he was "the only one" of the Republican presidential candidates who supported the surge in Iraq.


What is he talking about? All Republicans supported the surge -- including Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani. Indeed, the only ones who didn't support it were McCain’s usual allies, people like Sen. Chuck Hagel. The surge is the first part of the war on terrorism that caused McCain to break from Hagel in order to support the president.


True, McCain voted for the war. So did Hillary Clinton. Like her, he then immediately started attacking every other aspect of the war on terrorism. (The only difference was, he threw in frequent references to his experience as a POW, which currently outnumber John Kerry's references to being a Vietnam vet.)

Thus, McCain joined with the Democrats in demanding O.J. trials for terrorists at Guantanamo, including his insistence that the terrorists have full access to the intelligence files being used to prosecute them.

These days, McCain gives swashbuckling speeches about the terrorists who "will follow us home." But he still opposes dripping water down their noses. (He was a POW, you know. He was also a member of the Keating 5 scandal, which you probably don't know – but you will if he becomes the Republican nominee!)

Though McCain was far from the only Republican to support the surge, he does have the distinction of being the only Republican who voted against the Bush tax cuts. (Also the little lamented Sen. Lincoln Chafee, who later left the Republican Party.) Now McCain claims he opposed the tax cuts because they didn't include enough spending cuts. But that wasn't what he said at the time.

To the contrary, when McCain voted against Bush's 2001 tax cuts he cited the idiotic talking point of the Democrats, calling them tax cuts for the rich! "I cannot in good conscience," McCain said, "support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief."

The New York Times was in a swoon.

McCain started the vicious anti-Bush myth that, before the 2000 South Carolina primary, the Bush campaign made phone calls to voters calling McCain a "liar, cheat and a fraud" and accusing him of having an illegitimate black child. On the thin reed of a hearsay account from a random woman at a townhall meeting, McCain immediately blamed the calls on Bush. "I'm calling on my good friend George Bush," McCain said, "to stop this now. He comes from a better family. He knows better than this."

Bush denied that his campaign had anything to do with the alleged calls and, in a stunningly act, ordered his campaign to release the script of the calls being made in South Carolina.

Bush asked McCain to do the same for his calls implying that Bush was an anti-Catholic bigot, but McCain refused. Instead, McCain responded with a campaign commercial calling Bush a liar on the order of Bill Clinton:

MCCAIN: His ad twists the truth like Clinton. We're all pretty tired of that.

ANNOUNCER: Do we really want another politician in the White House America can't trust?


After massive investigations by the Los Angeles Times and investigative reporter Byron York, among others, it turned out that no such calls had been made by the Bush campaign – or by anyone else. With hundreds of thousands of "robo-calls" being left on answering machines across the state, that’s pretty solid evidence that the “illegitimate-child” calls, as well as the “liar, cheat, fraud" calls, were never made.

And yet, to this day, the media weep over Bush's underhanded tactics against McCain in the 2000 South Carolina primary.

In fact, the most vicious attack before the 2000 South Carolina primary came from McCain.

Seeking even more favorable press from The New York Times, McCain launched an unprovoked attack against the Rev. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, calling them "agents of intolerance." Unlike the phantom "black love child" calls, there's documentary evidence of this smear campaign.

To ensure he would get full media coverage for that little gem, McCain alerted the networks in advance that he planned to attack their favorite whipping boys. Newspaper editors across the country stood in awe of McCain's raw bravery. The New York Times praised him in an editorial that said the Republican Party "has for too long been tied to the cramped ideology of the Falwells and the Robertsons."

Though McCain generally votes pro-life -- as his Arizona constituency demands -- he embraces the loony lingo of the pro-abortion set, repeatedly assuring his pals in the media that he opposes the repeal of Roe v. Wade because it would force women to undergo "illegal and dangerous operations."

The more one examines the facts, the clearer it becomes that Dole was a million times better than McCain. Why not run him again?


COPYRIGHT 2008 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111